On Thursday the Topeka Capital-Journal reported
that a group
calls for inquiry into Kline's campaign money:
A legal watchdog organization called Wednesday for an Internal
Revenue Service review of Kansas Attorney General Phill Kline's actions
to obtain church support for his re-election campaign.
Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics, based in Washington,
D.C., released a statement asking for an IRS investigation of Kline
based on contents of an internal campaign memorandum written by Kline in
August. The memo, leaked in September, detailed "several activities
that may constitute illegal support of the Kline campaign by Kansas
churches," the statement said.
"The IRS should investigate his egregious conduct, as well as
that of the churches that may have violated the rules governing their
nonprofit status," Sloan said. [Melanie Sloan is the
executive director of CREW, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics,
based in Washington.]
The Topeka Capital-Journal failed to say anything
about the CREW group and why they might be making this complaint.
Canada Free Press, in an Oct 12 article, "George
Soros, buying the Democrats -- The wages of Soros" gives
information about the "owners" of the new Democratic
No, a vote cast today [for a national Democrat] is a
vote for the "owners" of the new Democratic Party. It's a vote
for the consolidation of power for the very folks who hold the purse
strings, the leases, the deep pockets, and those who craft the ideology,
create the 527's, fund the PR machines, write the pungent political
programs, and provide the men with the means to hold the failing heart
of the Party in hock.
Today it is clear that a ballot cast for
whichever of the two views of the Democrats you choose, is a vote for
one man--George Soros--and his personal political machines.
And thanks to George Soros and billions of dollars, his
527s--MoveOn,Org, Open Society Institute, Democracy Alliance, Campaign
for America's Future, Center for American Progress, America Coming
Together and the Media Fund--have come to be known as the Shadow Party
of the Democratic Party, and its saviors. They are all designed to raise
enormous amounts of money to directly circumvent the strictures placed
on the First Amendment by the McCain-Feingold finance folderol and have
usurped the new Democratic Party in everything but name.
Where was ANY information about George Soros and CREW missing
from the Topeka Capital-Journal article? More information from the
Canada Free Press:
More recently, another Soros front organization,
CREW, or Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, is
publicly attacking the FBI for peddling lies about CREW as part of what
CREW claims is the FBI's ongoing concealment of the Foley scandal, even
as the whole brouhaha seems to be fading away.
And the names of the shadow puppeteers controlling
CREW, according to FrontPage.com (click
here ), read like a who's who of Soros funding agencies. They
include Soros' favorite Open Society Institute, and Theresa Heinz
Kerry's Tide's Foundation, the Barbra Streisand Foundation, the Arca
Foundation, and the David Geffen Foundation, to name a few.
Some time ago, George Soros even teamed up with Hillary
Clinton to create the largest private voter data base in history, the
data warehouse project (click
here ), with Harold Ickes, Ms. Clinton's most loyal defender from
her White House days. This activity has since gone dark.
George Soros is now part and parcel of every major
new Democratic fund raising program thanks to the power of his 527s.
His money powers the Democratic attack machines, his private think tanks
and their wonks provide the latest initiatives for the Democratic Party,
and he determines who will be sued and run out of town.
The new Democratic Party, which has become a weakened
empty vestigial appendage of the Clintons, is also wholly owned by
George Soros and controlled by his 527s --an interlocking directorate.
When someone votes Democratic in November, they will
no longer vote for the Party, a particular politician, or anybody else
save George Soros, his endless anti-American activities, and for his
personal vision for our country.
So should we care what George Soros' Citizens for
Responsibility and Ethics, based in Washington thinks about Phill
Kline? When will CREW call for an investigation of churches that
allow liberal groups to use churches for political activities?
What about the liberal
MAINstream Coalition using the Plymouth Congregational Church in Lawrence
for their "Take Back Kansas" meeting? Or what about the non-profit
KCPT allowing public TV time to plug a liberal organization, MAINstream
Voices of Faith? Or what about the MAINstream
Voices of Faith using the Colonial Church in Prairie Village?
Why does CREW only complain when Phill Kline is near a church?
Recently the Wichita Eagle reported about an ACLU
forum to examine church-state separation, which will be held this week
in Wichita. Look who that article says will be at this forum:
How well do these groups represent the average Kansan?