|
April 4, 2007 |
|
|
|
Reno County Republicans miffed by Governor Sebelius'
Appointment of Magistrate Judge.
|
|
|
|
Instead of holding a special election when an elected official resigns, Kansas Law states how a replacement should be chosen. In partisan elections, where the winners of Democratic and Republican primaries meet in a general election, a replacement is chosen using the party precinct committee process as outlined in Kansas Law KSA 25-3902. The party of the person leaving office picks a replacement of the same party, who serves in office until the next regular election. Attorney General Robert Stephan issued Opinion No 94-157 on Nov 22, 1994:
While Stephan's opinion reflects the common impression on how replacements are made in partisan elected offices, there seems to be a contradiction with KSA 24-3902, which Stephan cited.
Before looking at KSA 24-312a, which was mentioned above, we need further clarification of "judge of district court" from KSA 20-301a:
One might assume the KSA 20-301a definition of "judge of the district court" should be applied to KSA 25-3902, which means KSA 25-3902 should NOT be used for the replacement of a magistrate judge even if elected in a partisan contest. This is the authority Sebelius assumed:
It's not clear what statute authorized the use of a judicial nominating committee selection followed by a Gubernatorial selection. Now that it's relatively clear who should make the selection (some Reno County Republicans disagree), let's review how this opening occurred and learn more about those involved in the selection process. In 2004 the state authorized a "new" magistrate judge position in Reno County to alleviate the court docket load to handle mostly first appearances, misdemeanors, traffic and small-claims cases. In August 2004, partisan primaries were held. The Aug 4, 2004 Hutchinson News reported:
The results of the November general election were reported by the Nov 8, 2004 Hutchinson News:
In 2006 Joe McCarville ran for a vacated District 27 court judgeship and was elected in Nov. 2006. This election left a vacancy for the Magistrate Judge position held by McCarville. Right after the Nov. election, some members in the leadership of the Reno County Republican Party started planning for a meeting of Republican precinct committees to make the selection of a replacement for Republican McCarville. That process had just stated when the Hutchinson News announced the Governor was getting involved in the replacement process. The Nov 10, 2006, the Hutchinson News said the replacement process would start once "Gov. Kathleen Sebelius establishes a selection committee in Reno County." Complaints by Reno County Republicans to Secretary of State Thornburgh and Reno County legislators were ignored. Why didn't the Hutchinson News allow public discussion of this issue? Why did the Hutchinson News never report anything about this conflict? The selection of judges in Kansas is becoming a more heated issue with the debate on which is the more "fair" process for selecting/replacing judges:
So, which is better? An openly-partisan selection of a replacement judge by elected precinct committees? Or, a "non-partisan" but quite partisan process involving political appointees, and political contributors on a "nominating committee" to hide the politics behind the selection of a new judge? The selection of judges in Kansas continues to be a biased, partisan process and in need of reform, yet the Kansas press pretends it's a fair and impartial process and devoid any politics. Let's review the replacement of a District Magistrate Judge that recently occurred in Reno County (27th Judicial District). The Hutchinson News recently reported that Randy McEwen was sworn in as Reno County magistrate judge.
Governor Sebelius' press release about this appointment fails to mention McEwen's long involvement in Democratic Party politics:
Why doesn't the press report how political this appointment is?
From Democratic Party Photo Gallery:
|

|
Was the involvement in the Reno County Democratic Party the best selection criteria for a magistrate judge? The other candidate for this judgeship was Cheryl Allen, who was a Democratic candidate for Magistrate Judge in 2004. Allen was a Democrat in 2005 but in early 2006 apparently became a registered Republican. That reason alone is likely why Sebelius didn't pick her over a Democratic Party activist Randy McEwen. Both were interviewed by a KBI special agent. Any political questions on the 26-page questionnaire they were both asked to fill out? Did the KBI agent talk to Dan Deming? Deming on his blog on Feb 22, 2006 said McEwen "managed to scare the hell out of a number of people earlier this month – and of all places, at an old folks home." McEwen "walked into a public legislative forum at Wesley Towers Retirement Community carrying a shotgun." ... but it wasn't loaded. See the whole story here. Is this the behavior of a magistrate judge? From the Hutchinson News, Feb 5, 2006:
Is the local nominating committee a group of concerned citizens, who want the best legal mind in their courtroom? Or, is the nominating committee a political group, all with political connections, wanting to make some sort of political appointment that has nothing to do with justice for the citizens of Reno County? Let's look at the political make-up of this "non-partisan" nominating committee: Members of Reno County Judicial Nominating Committee
Sources:
State Rep Pauls is an honorable public official and should be commended for her social concerns. I have no problem with Rep Pauls being on this selection committee, especially since she is a local elected official. She must be involved in politics just to be elected. However, as shown above, the other four members of this committee were ALL Sebelius contributors. THREE of the four members of this committee were also contributors to Democrat Paul Morrison for Attorney General. Why are we pretending that politics had nothing to do with the nomination by this committee, and the selection by Sebelius? We wish Judge Randy McEwen the best as he starts his service as a magistrate judge. Since this is an elected position, and this seat will be on the 2008 ballot, the voters in Hutchinson can decide then if this political money, and this selection process, matters to them. The Kansas Meadowlark has written about how Sebelius has abused the judicial system in her appointments, including:
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
efg
|
|
K a n s a s M e a d o w l a r k @ g m a i l . c o m |