Republicans for Moore Sue Gamble, who is Republican candidate for State Senate District 10, was featured in a 2004 “Republicans for Moore” ad in which she said:

“Please join me in helping re-elect Dennis Moore,” Sue Gamble, KS Board of Education

Dennis Moore is the Democratic Congressman from the Kansas Third Congressional District.

See the rectangle in the graphic below:

Sue Gamble, Republican for Moore, 2004

Why should Republicans in State Senate District 10 get behind a supporter of a Democratic Party Congressional Candidate (i.e., Dennis Moore), when they could vote for a Republican that supports other Republicans (namely, Mary Pilcher Cook)?

How does “Republican” Sue Gamble explain being a Republican for Democrat Moore in 2004?

A future Meadowlark article will give details of the 150+ “Republicans for Moore” who have re-registered as Democrats.


Related:

Tags: , ,

3 Comments to ““Republican for Moore” Running for Kansas Senate as a Republican”

  1. kans says:

    To answer the question, perhaps there are folks who evaluate the worth of a candidate regardless of the political party he represents.

    I’m a Republican and I voted for Dennis when he ran against Kobach and Ahner, because I thought he was the better candidate. So far, apparently most of the district agrees.

    But yeah – I’m glad I don’t have to choose between MPC and Sue Gamble. That’s like having to pick between being punched in the face or kicked in the nads: both are bad, but one’s worse. :)

  2. sasnak says:

    Although the religious right is a very small minority in Kansas, they are very well organized, and have been coached by their leadership to seek election as precienct captains by “stealth”, i.e., without revealing their anti-democratic, rightwing orthodoxy. that is why Kline’s so-called election by the republican party “leadership” was a shock to all. Now we know the lengths they are willing to go to, and should adjust our response accordingly.

  3. rockchalk says:

    If you want to “vote for the man” then register to be an independent. It’s really pretty simple.

    sasnak, I saw that exact same post in comments on the Lawrence JW website. Do you have a copy/paste problem?

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.