Greater Kansas City Chamber PAC (\ Kansas has weaker campaign finance reporting laws than Missouri and sometimes Kansas political money can be found in reports filed with the Missouri Ethics Commission before reports are filed with the Kansas Governmental Ethics Commission.

Earlier this year the Meadowlark reported the Greater Kansas City Chamber PAC, Awash With Cash, Formed New PACs to “Buy” Kansas Elections. It’s not clear how much of the Chamber’s political money will be used in Missouri and how much in Kansas, but reports filed by these three Missouri Chamber PACs on July 15 hint at what will be in their Kansas reports that are due next week.

Two of these three Chamber PACs gave the maximum amount to three Kansas Senate candidates, which shows one way this Missouri group is leveraging their political money and power in Kansas, to defeat social conservatives.


Greater Kansas City Chamber of Commerce (aka BizPAC)

Starting Balance $806,884
Money Raised $35,575
Money Spent $748,806
Money in the Bank $93,653

$5000 contributions each from

  • Embarq
  • Polsinell Shalton Flanigan Suelthuas
  • Stinson Morrison Hecker LLP
  • H&R Block
  • Blue Cross-Blue Sheild of Kansas City
  • YRC World Wide
  • Bryan Cave

Expenditures:

The Chamber gave a huge amount of its money to its other two PACs:

  • Life Sciences Fund of Greater Kansas city Chamber of Commerce PAC: $714,794
  • Higher Education Fund of the Greater Kansas City Chamber of Commerce PAC: $13,609

The Chamber’s PAC reported no contributions to Kansas candidates or party committees. All the other expenditures by this PAC were to Missouri candidates or party committees.


Life Sciences Fund of the Greater Kansas City Chamber of Commerce

Starting Balance $0
Money Raised $731,394
Money Spent $212,060
Money in the Bank $519,334

Expenditures:

  • Cooper Secrest Associates for research, $15,450

This is a group well-known to Kansas Democratic Party committees, candidates and groups:

PAC: The Life Science PAC gave $10,000 to Kathleen Sebelius’ Bluestem Fund PAC.

Other Kansas candidates receiving contributions from the Life Science PAC:

Kansas Senate (all Republicans)

Amount Candidate District City
$1000 Tim Owens 8 Overland Park
$1000 Sue Gamble 10 Shawnee
$1000 Ruth Teichman 33 Stafford
$1000 John Vratil 11 Leawood
$1000 Stephen Morrison 39 Hugoton
$1000 Dwayne Umbarger 14 Thayer
$1000 Pete Brungardt 24 Salina

Kansas House

Amount Candidate District Party City
$500 Barbara Craft 65 R Junction City
$500 Annie Kuether 55 D Topeka
$500 Kay Wolf 21 R Prairie Village
$500 Bruce Cooper 54 D Topeka

Higher Education Fund of the Greater Kansas City Chamber of Commerce

Starting Balance $0
Money Raised $28,709
Money Spent $3,100
Money in the Bank $25,609

Expenditures:

Almost all the money spent by this PAC were to three of the State Senate candidates the Life Science PAC gave to. We might find next week in the reports filed in Kansas that all three PACs gave maximum contributions to the same candidates. Thus, by forming multiple PACs, the Chamber can magnify its political strength, and it’s entirely legal.

Kansas Senate (all Republicans)

Amount Candidate District City
$1000 Tim Owens 8 Overland Park
$1000 Sue Gamble 10 Shawnee
$1000 Dwayne Umbarger 14 Thayer

See comments above under the Life Science PAC for additional information about these candidates.


Update: Kansas City Star’s Buzz Blog responds to this article.


Related:


Tags: ,

One Comment to “Missouri sunshine exposes Kansas political money”

  1. kansas_resident says:

    You write -
    “Thus, by forming multiple PACs, the Chamber can magnify its political strength, and it’s entirely legal.”
    Since both Kansas and Missouri have Republican controlled houses who passed these laws I guess you have to go complain to your senator/representative or RUN for office yourself.

    Begin supported by any branch of the NEA is not a bad thing – it helps weed out those who think the earth is 4,000 years old and gravity is still something under debate. Kansas does benefit from the quality of its education – lets not ruin that at any level.

    Might people who receive Life Sciences funding be in favor of stem cell research ? This is not a bad thing. Who would want to lose the Stowers Institute or its work ?

    If you are so concerned about PAC money how about working to eliminate the 527s like the Swift Boat folks or as mentioned here – http://www2.ljworld.com/news/2.....acs_boost/

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.