<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kansas Democratic Party&#8217;s &#8220;Loyalty Committee&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kansasmeadowlark.com/2008/07/30/kansas-democratic-partys-loyalty-committee/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kansasmeadowlark.com/2008/07/30/kansas-democratic-partys-loyalty-committee/</link>
	<description>Liberty-Minded, Freedom-Loving, Center-Right Digest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 23:33:14 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: bbi1of12</title>
		<link>http://kansasmeadowlark.com/2008/07/30/kansas-democratic-partys-loyalty-committee/comment-page-1/#comment-68</link>
		<dc:creator>bbi1of12</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 20:28:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kansasmeadowlark.com/?p=333#comment-68</guid>
		<description>pretty informative insights and I liked seeing the actual mailouts being used as examples.  Republicans are accused of an awful lot but Democrats are ruthless in suppressing dissent in their party.  No Big Tent with the Dems anymore with a national spotlight on Sebelius.  Give them credit for becoming VERY skilled in using the media and all the expensive multi-color mailouts.  Surprises me how good they can make someone sound that really hasn&#039;t done that much--  probably will turn quite a few Democrat votes for them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pretty informative insights and I liked seeing the actual mailouts being used as examples.  Republicans are accused of an awful lot but Democrats are ruthless in suppressing dissent in their party.  No Big Tent with the Dems anymore with a national spotlight on Sebelius.  Give them credit for becoming VERY skilled in using the media and all the expensive multi-color mailouts.  Surprises me how good they can make someone sound that really hasn&#8217;t done that much&#8211;  probably will turn quite a few Democrat votes for them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sasnak</title>
		<link>http://kansasmeadowlark.com/2008/07/30/kansas-democratic-partys-loyalty-committee/comment-page-1/#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator>sasnak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:28:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kansasmeadowlark.com/?p=333#comment-67</guid>
		<description>How many Republican campaign Meadowlark have you got paid to work for?
If we take Meadowlark’s reasoning he’s paid to take orders from these candidates and paid to print up absurd conspiracy theories.

&lt;strong&gt;EDITOR&#039;S NOTE&lt;/strong&gt;:  sasnak, the &lt;em&gt;Meadowlark&lt;/em&gt; is not paid for any content published here.  The Meadowlark makes no endorsements, and for now, doesn&#039;t even have ads.  

I cited facts about the Democrats making fun of Republicans over &quot;loyalty&quot; and showed how the Democrats were a bit hypocritical in how they&#039;re treating Senator Gilstrap.  You cite no facts. I don&#039;t see your logic.  You ignore the subject of the posting. Your insults are not welcome.

Your disrespectful comments are not welcome here and will be deleted in the future.  Cite facts and sources, apply logic to the article posted, and be pithy with your opinion.  PLEASE quit using a Kansas government computer during the work day to make your postings. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How many Republican campaign Meadowlark have you got paid to work for?<br />
If we take Meadowlark’s reasoning he’s paid to take orders from these candidates and paid to print up absurd conspiracy theories.</p>
<p><strong>EDITOR&#8217;S NOTE</strong>:  sasnak, the <em>Meadowlark</em> is not paid for any content published here.  The Meadowlark makes no endorsements, and for now, doesn&#8217;t even have ads.  </p>
<p>I cited facts about the Democrats making fun of Republicans over &#8220;loyalty&#8221; and showed how the Democrats were a bit hypocritical in how they&#8217;re treating Senator Gilstrap.  You cite no facts. I don&#8217;t see your logic.  You ignore the subject of the posting. Your insults are not welcome.</p>
<p>Your disrespectful comments are not welcome here and will be deleted in the future.  Cite facts and sources, apply logic to the article posted, and be pithy with your opinion.  PLEASE quit using a Kansas government computer during the work day to make your postings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
